6 May 2025
Nathan W. Thooft, CFA, CIO, Multi-Asset Solutions Team, Global Equities

On the back of escalating tariffs between the United States and other parts of the world, markets have dropped significantly as economic growth concerns have risen and investor sentiment and consumer confidence have destabilized, with some markets tiptoeing precariously on the precipice of bear market territory as of this writing.1 Here’s how Nathan W. Thooft, CFA, CIO, Multi-Asset Solutions Team, Global Equities, is thinking about asset allocation in the current environment.
We entered 2025 with an expectation for greater policy uncertainty and market volatility—a scenario that’s certainly played out in the first quarter. However, the recent tariff announcements—both larger in scale and higher than expected—have brought about even higher levels of disruption.
In our view, this period of volatility and uncertainty is likely to continue until we see more conciliatory tariff conversations take place between the United States and its trading partners, which have historically taken time to negotiate. We do expect even after negotiations that tariff rates will be materially higher than recent history, therefore requiring other offsetting growth policies to minimize the economic pain such as tax reductions, deregulation, and fiscal spending.
The Office of the United States Trade Representative used trade deficits relative to imports to calculate reciprocal tariffs, which we believe could complicate future negotiations as it’s unclear what each country can concede to the United States to gain carve-outs.
Consequently, it appears that the rough framework the United States would apply to more challenging trade partners might look like this: Retaliatory tariffs get announced, Washington ratchets up its multiplier, negotiations begin, and eventually a détente/pause ensues. In our view, the ability for Washington and its trade partners to reach an agreement is constrained by the administration’s desire to eliminate the country’s trade deficit.
The longer the negotiations take, the longer the period of uncertainty, and the more of a paralytic effect it’ll likely have on consumers, companies, and investors. In the absence of a clear policy framework, planning can become challenging. As a result, it’s likely that fewer decisions will be made, reducing purchasing decisions accordingly. This decision paralysis compounds existing concerns that the United States and other economies are already experiencing weakening economic growth, leading to growing concerns of a recession.
Uncertainty may abound, but we’d remind investors that markets often defy odds and manage to scale walls of worry as they look past near-term concerns to opportunities further in the future. However, this doesn’t mean investors should be overly complacent.
One of our key themes for 2025 is to adopt a more defensive posture in our approach to investing. At a time when we’re seeing U.S. equity valuations at near-peak levels, tight credit spreads, geopolitical uncertainty, and uneven economic growth around the world—not to mention the potential for varying degrees of trade wars—enhancing portfolio resilience while still taking advantage of upside opportunities seems prudent. For investors with a longer investment horizon, we believe recent events can lead to compelling investment opportunities.
We’ve seen markets slip into panic mode before (was March 2020 just five years ago?). As it was then and in periods before that, it’s important for investors to maintain a broader perspective and consider diversification to help mitigate the worst of the impact of the market drawdown. Here’s how we’re thinking about asset allocation in the current environment.
Although it’s likely that market volatility may abate as Washington engages in more constructive conversations with its trading partners, we expect the process to be protracted. That said, it’s worth bearing in mind that not everything needs to be resolved before markets start to head in a positive direction.
Predicting market performance is seldom straightforward even in the best of times; however, we do have access to historical data that can serve as a guide for us. Historical data indicates that equity markets often recover following steep sell-offs, and these rebounds are typically sharp, sustained, and swift, underscoring the importance of staying invested.
S&P 500 Index: 10 worst trading days and what happens after (%)
In descending order
| Dates | 1-day drawdown | Return after 1 year | Return after 3 years | Return after 5 years | Return after 10 years |
| Mar 16, 2020 | -12.0 | 68.9 | 74.2 | 157.0 | N/A |
| Mar 12, 2020 | -9.5 | 61.8 | 63.1 | 144.0 | N/A |
| Oct 15, 2008 | -9.0 | 24.0 | 41.4 | 109.0 | 275.4 |
| Dec 1, 2008 | -8.9 | 39.3 | 62.9 | 146.3 | 315.0 |
| Sep 29, 2008 | -8.8 | -1.5 | 12.2 | 69.9 | 226.4 |
| Oct 9, 2008 | -7.6 | 0.9 | 40.5 | 103.5 | 292.2 |
| Mar 9, 2020 | -7.6 | 43.6 | 49.8 | 121.0 | N/A |
| Oct 27, 1997 | -6.9 | 23.4 | 62.0 | 8.7 | 102.5 |
| Aug 31, 1998 | -6.8 | 39.8 | 22.5 | 13.0 | 60.1 |
| Nov 20, 2008 | -6.7 | 48.8 | 68.7 |
164.3 |
334.5 |
Source: Manulife Investment Management, as of April 7, 2025. The S&P 500 Index tracks the performance of 500 of the largest publicly traded companies in the United States. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
In our view, adopting an active approach to investing, rather than a reactive one, makes the most sense at this point. It’s far more constructive to remain thoughtful and considered, ensuring that allocation decisions remain aligned with long-term goals. While opportunities can emerge amid volatility, having the clarity of mind to recognize them is just as critical.
The coming weeks—possibly, months—are likely to be rocky, and market conditions could well test even seasoned investors with nerves of steels. However, in times like this, we think it's even more important to stay diversified, nimble, and above all, invested.
1 Bloomberg, as of April 8, 2025.
人工智能背後的實質資產及基建
人工智能的討論往往圍繞模型與應用方面,但其發展很大程度上有賴更為實在的要素。數據中心、電網及原材料等實質資產構成支撐人工智能發展的實體基礎。隨著結構性因素重塑投資格局,實質資產逐漸成為推動人工智能建設的支柱。
人工智能創新:亞洲正協助打造其背後的多項關鍵技術
回顧電力剛發明時,全球先建設發電廠及輸電線路等必要基建,其後才能展開真正的轉型。人工智能的發展正經歷類似過程。現時企業對晶片、數據中心及電網的大規模投資,正為人工智能應用在未來數年逐步擴展奠下基礎。在我們看來,市場討論焦點正愈來愈由「人工智能採用能否延續」轉向「支撐人工智能發展的關鍵基建如何落地與擴建」。在這個發展進程中,亞洲看來正扮演重要角色。
人工智能背後的引擎:半導體正推動下一個科技時代
半導體屬於全球整合度極高、分工最精細的產業鏈之一。由晶片設計、設備與材料,到製造及商業化,單是一枚智能手機晶片的生產流程,已橫跨多個大洲、涉及多個國家,為企業、消費者及投資者帶來龐大機遇。隨着半導體愈來愈成為一場不少人尚未準備就緒的人工智能(AI)競賽之基石,理解此行業將是掌握下一波科技競爭走向的關鍵。
人工智能背後的實質資產及基建
人工智能的討論往往圍繞模型與應用方面,但其發展很大程度上有賴更為實在的要素。數據中心、電網及原材料等實質資產構成支撐人工智能發展的實體基礎。隨著結構性因素重塑投資格局,實質資產逐漸成為推動人工智能建設的支柱。
人工智能創新:亞洲正協助打造其背後的多項關鍵技術
回顧電力剛發明時,全球先建設發電廠及輸電線路等必要基建,其後才能展開真正的轉型。人工智能的發展正經歷類似過程。現時企業對晶片、數據中心及電網的大規模投資,正為人工智能應用在未來數年逐步擴展奠下基礎。在我們看來,市場討論焦點正愈來愈由「人工智能採用能否延續」轉向「支撐人工智能發展的關鍵基建如何落地與擴建」。在這個發展進程中,亞洲看來正扮演重要角色。
人工智能背後的引擎:半導體正推動下一個科技時代
半導體屬於全球整合度極高、分工最精細的產業鏈之一。由晶片設計、設備與材料,到製造及商業化,單是一枚智能手機晶片的生產流程,已橫跨多個大洲、涉及多個國家,為企業、消費者及投資者帶來龐大機遇。隨着半導體愈來愈成為一場不少人尚未準備就緒的人工智能(AI)競賽之基石,理解此行業將是掌握下一波科技競爭走向的關鍵。