6 May 2025
Nathan W. Thooft, CFA, CIO, Multi-Asset Solutions Team, Global Equities

On the back of escalating tariffs between the United States and other parts of the world, markets have dropped significantly as economic growth concerns have risen and investor sentiment and consumer confidence have destabilized, with some markets tiptoeing precariously on the precipice of bear market territory as of this writing.1 Here’s how Nathan W. Thooft, CFA, CIO, Multi-Asset Solutions Team, Global Equities, is thinking about asset allocation in the current environment.
We entered 2025 with an expectation for greater policy uncertainty and market volatility—a scenario that’s certainly played out in the first quarter. However, the recent tariff announcements—both larger in scale and higher than expected—have brought about even higher levels of disruption.
In our view, this period of volatility and uncertainty is likely to continue until we see more conciliatory tariff conversations take place between the United States and its trading partners, which have historically taken time to negotiate. We do expect even after negotiations that tariff rates will be materially higher than recent history, therefore requiring other offsetting growth policies to minimize the economic pain such as tax reductions, deregulation, and fiscal spending.
The Office of the United States Trade Representative used trade deficits relative to imports to calculate reciprocal tariffs, which we believe could complicate future negotiations as it’s unclear what each country can concede to the United States to gain carve-outs.
Consequently, it appears that the rough framework the United States would apply to more challenging trade partners might look like this: Retaliatory tariffs get announced, Washington ratchets up its multiplier, negotiations begin, and eventually a détente/pause ensues. In our view, the ability for Washington and its trade partners to reach an agreement is constrained by the administration’s desire to eliminate the country’s trade deficit.
The longer the negotiations take, the longer the period of uncertainty, and the more of a paralytic effect it’ll likely have on consumers, companies, and investors. In the absence of a clear policy framework, planning can become challenging. As a result, it’s likely that fewer decisions will be made, reducing purchasing decisions accordingly. This decision paralysis compounds existing concerns that the United States and other economies are already experiencing weakening economic growth, leading to growing concerns of a recession.
Uncertainty may abound, but we’d remind investors that markets often defy odds and manage to scale walls of worry as they look past near-term concerns to opportunities further in the future. However, this doesn’t mean investors should be overly complacent.
One of our key themes for 2025 is to adopt a more defensive posture in our approach to investing. At a time when we’re seeing U.S. equity valuations at near-peak levels, tight credit spreads, geopolitical uncertainty, and uneven economic growth around the world—not to mention the potential for varying degrees of trade wars—enhancing portfolio resilience while still taking advantage of upside opportunities seems prudent. For investors with a longer investment horizon, we believe recent events can lead to compelling investment opportunities.
We’ve seen markets slip into panic mode before (was March 2020 just five years ago?). As it was then and in periods before that, it’s important for investors to maintain a broader perspective and consider diversification to help mitigate the worst of the impact of the market drawdown. Here’s how we’re thinking about asset allocation in the current environment.
Although it’s likely that market volatility may abate as Washington engages in more constructive conversations with its trading partners, we expect the process to be protracted. That said, it’s worth bearing in mind that not everything needs to be resolved before markets start to head in a positive direction.
Predicting market performance is seldom straightforward even in the best of times; however, we do have access to historical data that can serve as a guide for us. Historical data indicates that equity markets often recover following steep sell-offs, and these rebounds are typically sharp, sustained, and swift, underscoring the importance of staying invested.
S&P 500 Index: 10 worst trading days and what happens after (%)
In descending order
| Dates | 1-day drawdown | Return after 1 year | Return after 3 years | Return after 5 years | Return after 10 years |
| Mar 16, 2020 | -12.0 | 68.9 | 74.2 | 157.0 | N/A |
| Mar 12, 2020 | -9.5 | 61.8 | 63.1 | 144.0 | N/A |
| Oct 15, 2008 | -9.0 | 24.0 | 41.4 | 109.0 | 275.4 |
| Dec 1, 2008 | -8.9 | 39.3 | 62.9 | 146.3 | 315.0 |
| Sep 29, 2008 | -8.8 | -1.5 | 12.2 | 69.9 | 226.4 |
| Oct 9, 2008 | -7.6 | 0.9 | 40.5 | 103.5 | 292.2 |
| Mar 9, 2020 | -7.6 | 43.6 | 49.8 | 121.0 | N/A |
| Oct 27, 1997 | -6.9 | 23.4 | 62.0 | 8.7 | 102.5 |
| Aug 31, 1998 | -6.8 | 39.8 | 22.5 | 13.0 | 60.1 |
| Nov 20, 2008 | -6.7 | 48.8 | 68.7 |
164.3 |
334.5 |
Source: Manulife Investment Management, as of April 7, 2025. The S&P 500 Index tracks the performance of 500 of the largest publicly traded companies in the United States. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
In our view, adopting an active approach to investing, rather than a reactive one, makes the most sense at this point. It’s far more constructive to remain thoughtful and considered, ensuring that allocation decisions remain aligned with long-term goals. While opportunities can emerge amid volatility, having the clarity of mind to recognize them is just as critical.
The coming weeks—possibly, months—are likely to be rocky, and market conditions could well test even seasoned investors with nerves of steels. However, in times like this, we think it's even more important to stay diversified, nimble, and above all, invested.
1 Bloomberg, as of April 8, 2025.
非另一個泡沫:半導體正推動一個真實的未來
半導體幾乎支撐着每一種現代生活體驗 - 由智能手機與汽車,到雲端運算,以至現時的人工智能(AI)工具 - 然而對大多數人而言,它們往往「看不見」。半導體不僅是晶片,其需求亦正受到多項長期結構性力量所支持。我們認為,當前市場對半導體的興奮情緒,並不會重演科網泡沫,因為相關投資是建基於實質的基建建設及可帶來收入的服務,而非單純炒作。此外,機遇版圖亦不止於少數最受注目的AI「龍頭」企業。
全球科技與半導體:推動回報的因素及下一步觀察重點
截至 2026 年,半導體一直是全球股票市場中表現最強的板塊之一,其表現受惠於需求強勁與基本面改善的強大組合。市場焦點一直集中在人工智能(AI),但可把握的機遇並不局限於單一主題或少數公司。隨着 AI 基建持續擴張,帶動的投資不僅限於高性能運算晶片,亦涵蓋支撐現代數據中心運作所需的網絡與供電相關技術。與此同時,AI 以外的部分產業亦開始出現穩定及復甦的初步跡象。
實體資產復興:在去全球化世界中確保電力、物資與能源供應
全球供應鏈正因去全球化、地緣政治以及能源與科技安全的競賽而重塑,焦點從「低成本、追求效率」轉向「區域化、強韌韌性」。在這種成本上升、持續通脹壓力及供給受限的環境下,實體資產在協助投資人應對不確定性並掌握長期結構性趨勢方面,扮演越來越重要的角色。
非另一個泡沫:半導體正推動一個真實的未來
半導體幾乎支撐着每一種現代生活體驗 - 由智能手機與汽車,到雲端運算,以至現時的人工智能(AI)工具 - 然而對大多數人而言,它們往往「看不見」。半導體不僅是晶片,其需求亦正受到多項長期結構性力量所支持。我們認為,當前市場對半導體的興奮情緒,並不會重演科網泡沫,因為相關投資是建基於實質的基建建設及可帶來收入的服務,而非單純炒作。此外,機遇版圖亦不止於少數最受注目的AI「龍頭」企業。
全球科技與半導體:推動回報的因素及下一步觀察重點
截至 2026 年,半導體一直是全球股票市場中表現最強的板塊之一,其表現受惠於需求強勁與基本面改善的強大組合。市場焦點一直集中在人工智能(AI),但可把握的機遇並不局限於單一主題或少數公司。隨着 AI 基建持續擴張,帶動的投資不僅限於高性能運算晶片,亦涵蓋支撐現代數據中心運作所需的網絡與供電相關技術。與此同時,AI 以外的部分產業亦開始出現穩定及復甦的初步跡象。
實體資產復興:在去全球化世界中確保電力、物資與能源供應
全球供應鏈正因去全球化、地緣政治以及能源與科技安全的競賽而重塑,焦點從「低成本、追求效率」轉向「區域化、強韌韌性」。在這種成本上升、持續通脹壓力及供給受限的環境下,實體資產在協助投資人應對不確定性並掌握長期結構性趨勢方面,扮演越來越重要的角色。