Skip to main content
Back

Watching on the U.S. mid-terms? What history tells us about market performance and behaviour

22 October 2026

As U.S. midterm elections approach in November, louder headlines may tempt some investors to wait on the sidelines. We believe history offers some useful context for understanding market behaviour around election cycles. Here is what decades of election-cycle data may tell us, and why patience has often mattered.

Key points:

  • Since 1928, the S&P 500 Index has risen in 22 of 24 years following a midterm election, averaging 17.9%.
  • Stocks have tended to lag before Election Day and recover afterwards.
  • Over the long term, US stocks have risen under both Republican and Democratic presidencies.
  • We believe time in the market may matter more than timing the market.

Election noise versus market history

Heated election campaigns can leave investors feeling uneasy about the country and the markets. Yet since 1928, the S&P 500 has historically performed best in the year after midterm elections. Midterm years themselves have been more mixed, averaging 7.2% with 14 positive and 10 negative years. One possible reason for the post-midterm strength is that campaign promises may buoy corporate earnings. In our view, election-related concerns alone may not justify changing a long-term investment approach.

post-midterm-average-returns

Early-cycle wobbles may ease after the vote

Stocks have tended to lag in the months before elections, when primaries create uncertainty about candidates. On average, election-period returns trailed non-election periods until after the vote, then moved ahead, reaching 19.5% versus 15.4% by month 18. Volatility has also been modest around most recent presidential elections, with exceptions in 2000, 2008 and 2020. Investors who step aside during uncertain months may miss the recovery that has often followed.

stocks-lag-before-midterms-rebound-after-election

 

stock-market-volatility-before-and-after-elections

It may be about time, not parties

We believe the bigger lesson is that stocks have risen over the long term regardless of which party held the White House. A hypothetical US$1,000 invested in the S&P 500 in 1928 would have grown to about US$9.5 million by the end of 2025, despite wars, recessions and market shocks. Across six combinations of White House and Congress control, average annual S&P 500 returns since 1928 were positive in every case, ranging from 2.3% to 17.6%.

stocks-grew-regardless-of-party-in-power

 

average-annual-sp500-returns-by-political-party

Staying invested may matter more than perfect timing

Short-term periods can disappoint. A 60/40 stock-bond portfolio averaged 6.17% in midterm years versus 12.29% in other years between 1976 and 2025. Still, markets have historically recovered from crises, and investors who stayed invested through difficult periods may have been rewarded in the long term.

60-40-stock-bond-portfolio-performance

We believe a diversified portfolio that suits investors’ goals and risk tolerance, and a long-term view, may help investors look past the election noise. Every election cycle is different, but we believe the lesson from history is consistent: focus on the long term rather than the headlines.

 

Download full PDF

  • Implications of US midterm elections on Asian equities

    While selected markets and sectors may see near-term volatility as investors assess the implications for fiscal policy, trade, regulation and US Treasury yields, the overall impact on Asian equities may be limited. More importantly, domestic growth drivers, policy priorities and company fundamentals are likely to remain the key drivers of the region’s equity markets.

    Read more
  • Manulife Global Multi-Asset Diversified Income (GMADI) Fund: Navigating the selloff

    The strategy has not been immune to the recent equity sell-off, particularly given its selected exposure to semiconductor and AI-infrastructure themes. Looking ahead, the emphasis remains on diversification, income generation and disciplined security selection.

    Read more
  • Asian Fixed Income: Navigating the selloff

    We remain constructive on Asia fixed income despite recent market volatility. We see a few potential medium-term catalysts, including stronger foreign investment flows into select Asian economies and a more benign inflation backdrop.

    Read more
See all
  • Implications of US midterm elections on Asian equities

    While selected markets and sectors may see near-term volatility as investors assess the implications for fiscal policy, trade, regulation and US Treasury yields, the overall impact on Asian equities may be limited. More importantly, domestic growth drivers, policy priorities and company fundamentals are likely to remain the key drivers of the region’s equity markets.

    read more
  • Manulife Global Multi-Asset Diversified Income (GMADI) Fund: Navigating the selloff

    The strategy has not been immune to the recent equity sell-off, particularly given its selected exposure to semiconductor and AI-infrastructure themes. Looking ahead, the emphasis remains on diversification, income generation and disciplined security selection.

    read more
  • Asian Fixed Income: Navigating the selloff

    We remain constructive on Asia fixed income despite recent market volatility. We see a few potential medium-term catalysts, including stronger foreign investment flows into select Asian economies and a more benign inflation backdrop.

    read more
see all